Rough and ready looking I know but this is the final version of the firing arcs. There are port and starboard shown in the left hand diagram whilst forward and aft wide are centre and right respectively. Forward and aft wide overlap with port and starboard and they can be further divided into forward and aft - straight off the bow or stern - and with the option for forward or aft wide solely on the port or starboard beam.
I am often guilty of over-thinking a given situation. This is especially true when it comes to writing wargame rules! A case in point has been the eternal soul-searching, hand-wringing and quite frankly torturous evolution of the firing arcs for the new book. I think I finally have it dialled in though, and, thanks to a valuable brainstorming session at the club last night with Messrs. Fox and Huband, I am even more certain!
I have been looking at this all wrong. I should have learned from the Portable Ironclads Wargame (more accurately Developing the Portable Ironclads Wargame) but unfortunately I repeated the same mistake. I will not bore you with the tedious details but suffice it to say, there are four main firing arcs - port, starboard, forward wide and aft wide. The latter overlap the port and starboard arcs and both can, if required, be further subdivided into forward or aft - the row of hexes directly off the bow or stern respectively - or with port or starboard option. This equates to ten arcs if all were used. Where a gun or guns can bear in multiple arcs this is noted on the ship record chart and guess what? This is where the comma comes in. For example, a forward turret that can cover the forward wide arc (which includes the forward and the port and starboard parts) could also cover the port and starboard arcs. Previously this would have had its own diagram and would use the notation FWPS. No longer, as this is now described as FW, P, S. It is the same as FWPS but it better reflects the simpler arc convention and more importantly, can be seen in one of three diagrams rather than twenty! The eagle eyed will also note that I have made the overall Forward or Aft Wide arcs rather more generous in their coverage than previously - this was the mistake I made previously with the Portable Ironclads Wargame. Again, this can be seen in the series of diagrams above.
The plan is to test this at the club in a couple of weeks but in the meantime I will need to tweak the ship specs and change a fair amount of text to reflect the new system. Mea Culpa and all that.
Aside from the brainstorm session there was the small matter of presenting both Messrs Fox and Huband with some Axis and Allies goodies, acquisitions due to some eBay stalking and a bespoke solution now in the collection of Mr Huband. I have added to my own collection by virtue of some boardgame disposals so the Imperial coffers have not taken a hit - just as well as the car has cost a total of just under £600 for a variety of reasons - a new battery, a full service and a replacement pressure sensor!
1:900th scale counters for use until the models are available, along with the turning circle.
Mr Fox presented me with a copy of the rules you see above. I had never seen these although the name Phil Dunn is well known to naval gamers. The rules look to be very much of their time - not that that is a bad thing - but by jingo there is a whole heap of potential! This is something I will take a good look at and then add it to the project list. Probably….
Another set of rules for WW2 naval. Heard good things about this set so will have a look and see what all the fuss is about!
The final piece of naval related news is that I was able to score a copy of Nimitz, the WW2 naval rules by Sam Mustafa from Mr Roche at the club. I have had my eye on these for a while but had not gotten around to getting a copy. More naval related reading material is never a bad thing in my experience!
No comments:
Post a Comment